Back to Case studies
Reference architecture

Demand forecasting and replenishment analytics

A multi-region retailer planned replenishment from spreadsheets that could not absorb seasonal volatility or promotions.

Conceptual visualization only

Engagement at a glance

Reference architecture
Discipline: AI / ML
Industry: Retail and e-commerce
Technology: Machine learning
Cloud: AWS
Region: Illustrative

Improved forecast stability across seasonal categories

Objectives

  • Improve forecast stability across seasonal categories
  • Give planners explainable drivers, not just a number
  • Automate weekly forecast delivery into existing BI tooling

Data sources

  • Historical sales by SKU, store and week
  • Promotion and pricing calendars
  • Stock-on-hand and lead-time records
  • Public holiday and weather series

Architecture and approach

Feature pipelines in Python, gradient-boosted forecasting, BI dashboards and alerting.

  1. Step 1

    Baseline

    Simple seasonal baselines set the bar every model had to beat.

  2. Step 2

    Feature engineering

    Lags, promotion flags, price elasticity proxies and calendar effects.

  3. Step 3

    Backtesting

    Rolling-origin evaluation per category rather than a single global score.

  4. Step 4

    Delivery

    Weekly automated runs writing forecasts and confidence bands to BI.

  5. Step 5

    Monitoring

    Drift alerts and periodic retraining triggered by error thresholds.

Technologies used

  • Python feature pipelines with Pandas and Polars
  • Gradient-boosted forecasting models with backtesting
  • AWS Step Functions orchestration and S3 feature storage
  • BI dashboards with alerting on forecast drift

Security and governance

  • Aggregated commercial data only; no customer personal data
  • Least-privilege IAM roles per pipeline stage
  • Encrypted storage and audited access to forecast outputs

Output

Reported against the objectives set out for this reference architecture.

Forecast stability

Improved

Largest gains in promotion-heavy seasonal categories.

Planning cycle

Manual → automated

Weekly assembly replaced by a scheduled pipeline.

Explainability

Driver breakdown

Planners see which features moved each forecast.

Lessons learned

  • Per-category evaluation exposed problems a single global metric hid.
  • Planner trust came from explainability, not from a lower headline error.
Reference architecture illustrating method and architecture only. It is not a verified client project, and no client commissioned it.
Discuss a similar problem

Ready to scope your AI initiative?

Share your objective and constraints. A specialist reviews every request before any recommendation is issued.